When science becomes a religion

We are told that when ‘witches’ believed mouldy cheese could treat certain ailments they were mocked by the scientific community, but that it eventually became accepted that these witches were in fact correct; mouldy cheese contains what are now considered medicinally-useful antibiotics.   But what is to be learned from the apparent conceit of the scientific mind that it could mock such a correct idea?

It should be recognised that by conventional ideas of empirical science, the supposed ‘scientists’ were in fact not being empirical in the manner the witches were.   The witches were no doubt basing their assertion on prior experience, whereas the scientists seemed to feel justified in roundly dismissing the notion – presumably on the basis that the witches had no corresponding theory behind their claims.

Such a position is profoundly stupid.   Whereas our supposed understanding of the world may require theories, the world and its behaviour is not dependent on those theories.   Rejecting ideas due to lack of theoretical support is stupid – as stupid as refusing to accept the sun is hot because one has no theory to prove it so.   Notably, educated people can be that stupid when science blinds them.   The quasi-religious conviction in science as an infallible knowledge resource within today’s culture often causes that which cannot be substantiated by scientific theory to be rubbished reflexively – that is, without even bothering to test if it might be correct.

This sort of automatic denial of any ideas not validated via science’s accepted theoretical frameworks is a truly arrogant form of intellectual conceit.   As such, it also reflects another form of stupidity: a failure to understand that theoretical thinking is simply the mind’s attempts to succinctly encapsulate and provide something by way of explanations regarding whatever phenomena have been observed.   But theory is surely never justified in taking any sort of god-like stance by which it dictates that which can and cannot be observed – without even checking.   If only the aforementioned scientists had had the humility to understand such an issue, they would never have been so self-righteous as to dismiss the witches’ legitimate claims.   They would never have made such fools of themselves.

But within the modern culture of science, making a fool of oneself on logical grounds is rarely a problem; most people – scientists and laymen alike – are too blinded by their rabid scientism to notice any underlying stupidity in rigidly following what are mere beliefs.

An example of this unobserved stupidity concerns the recent photographs purporting to show black holes.   It can be reasoned that the claims made about such photographs are every bit as illogical as a discussion about the four sides of a triangle.

Whenever the mind deploys any concept at all, subsequent constructive thinking about whatever has been conceptualized relies on associations with one or more attributes.   As regards a triangle, one assumed attribute is that it has straight and wholly connected sides such that it can therefore only have three sides, given its three angles.   In simpler terms, we all know the common understanding of ‘triangle’ as being an enclosed area bounded by three straight lines and so we deem it nonsense to talk of a four-sided triangle.

Applying this same thought process to the concept ‘black hole’, it can be noted that the name ‘black hole’ was chosen to describe an entity from which no light can escape, and the name achieves this even more explicitly than the name ‘triangle’ specifies three sides, given that the number of angles in a triangle does not directly state its number of sides.   Therefore, it can be said that, given photography depends on light being emitted or reflected from whatever is photographed, the idea of a ‘black hole photograph’ is logically a total paradox.   When originally postulated, the main and defining characteristic of a black hole was in effect that it could never be photographed – and that attribute was considered so central to the concept that it actually birthed the name of the entity.   In short, by definition, a black hole cannot be photographed.

And yet, if confronted with this thoroughly logical challenge to ‘black hole photography’, many scientific minds will squirm their way around this obvious paradox.   They will likely try to explain that by some newly-invented theoretical add-on, black hole photography is indeed a possibility.   Of course, such minds would never dream of arguing four-sided triangles were possibilities, but with a concept as complex and ultimately mystical as a black hole, their powers of reasoning become compromised by a need to defend and bolster their belief system.   In this example, it is as if eagerness to believe in black holes causes a sort of intellectual blindness regarding the stupidity within that which is being presented as supposed proof of black holes.   Although they have learned that by definition black holes cannot emit light, their minds have no problem with the idea that light from black holes has somehow been captured on camera.

In reality, it may be that the photographs in question have captured some entity – or perhaps two entities colliding – and that those entities can be considered as having certain attributes in common with popular notions of black holes, but it remains only logical that the very existence of any such photograph dictates that whatever is on the photograph is absolutely not the image of a black hole as black holes have traditionally been understood.   In short, the scientist needs to relearn the absolute basics of logic if he cannot accept that whatever cannot emit light cannot emit light.

However, at this stage the scientific mind is likely to argue that, rather than being illogical, he is in fact quite logically embellishing the theory of black holes by specifying certain conditions under which black holes can indeed emit light.   But under close philosophical examination, such intellectual wriggling is quite remarkable in its attempt to present evidence wholly at odds with a theory as something that actually bolsters that theory.   Are there any other areas of culture where such illogicality would be deemed acceptable?

Something between naivety and mental trickery can be discerned among those religious minds that argue for a kindly god on the basis of wonderful worldly events, only to quickly invent the devil to explain the many happenings that turn out to be not so wonderful.   But the supposedly scientific mind can be even more ridiculous.   The scientist can in effect argue that evidence directly contradicting his ideas proves that he is on the right track and he is therefore all the wiser as a result.   Hence, one of the most pernicious aspects of the scientific doctrine is that any findings whatsoever – be they supportive or contradictory as regards currently-accepted theories and ideas – only render the doctrine ever more believable in the eyes of its followers.

Much as some have argued that the essence of scientific proof rests on the fact that scientific claims are testable and therefore potentially capable of falsification, the cult of science has exploited this test by insisting that even falsification nourishes the scientific doctrine.

There is however, some logic to this argument – at least in the basic sense that all observations inform the mind about the world it tries to interpret.   But as regards supposed photographs of black holes, this is an argument that invalidates previous theories every bit as much as it substantiates any new theoretical formulations.   Why are these photographs championed as ‘proof of black holes’ any more than as refutations of black hole theory?

The greater lesson to be learned in all this is that theories are nothing more than mere ideas that hold sway only until such times as they get debunked.   More exactly, it can therefore be stated that a theory can never be proven to be correct; at best, it can only be stated that a theory has not as yet been falsified or debunked.

On an even wider front, the real problem lies in a failure to distinguish between mere theory and empirical evidence – the two being too-routinely conflated under the general umbrella of ‘doing science’ when they are in fact profoundly different modes of honing ideas regarding the world.   Whereas the empirical approach is based primarily on sensory observation of changes in the surrounding environment, the theoretical approach has no immediate need of sensory input at all and is typically founded on a blend of mental reflections and other primarily-cognitive activities.

This failure to correctly assess the various strands of the overall scientific endeavor leads to a form of stupidity by which wildly speculative theories can be uncritically accepted as if they were the findings of empirical tests.   What too often happens is that the theory lurks within the scientific community waiting for some supposed proof, such that when some experiment provides the predicted result the theory is hailed as ‘the truth’.

A classic example of this concerns the theory of relativity itself.   An elaborate set of theoretical concepts and ideas – largely founded on mathematical work and therefore devoid of any empirical support – was put forward on the basis that a suitable test of those ideas would be to examine whether or not light was bent when it passed by our sun.   When it seemed that light was indeed bent on passing the sun, the whole raft of theoretical ideas was pretty well accepted hook, line and sinker by mainstream academic physics – all as if one single observation justified a complete rethink about how our universe is put together.

Notably, although the phenomenon of light being bent around our sun now appears thoroughly verified, the initial test results remain highly debatable due to the crude nature of the equipment involved, and it seems likely that the initial acceptance of ‘experimental proof’ was likely based on wishful thinking or so-called ‘confirmation bias’ rather than on any reliable scientific tests.

Furthermore, given that many thinkers in the field of physics believe the photons believed to constitute light possess some minimal level of mass, it would surely have been odd, even by conventional Newtonian physics, to discover that light was not bent as it passed through the sun’s gravitational forces.   Just why are scientists so eager to substantiate their ideas that they reflexively exaggerate the significance of whatever is observed?

Regardless of whether or not they actually exist, phenomena such as black holes, dark matter and evidence supporting relativity and the big-bang theories have all been actively searched out as enthusiastically as hard-to-find treasure is.   But it is easily argued that, not only are any findings that appear to support such theories given more credit than they truly merit, the very effort to validate the hypothetical postulates of any theory constitutes a perversion in terms of science being unbiased.   On the one hand, a finding which supports a theory only extends the field within which such a theory appears relevant; it does not validate the theory in any general sense.   On the other hand, choosing to hunt down supporting evidence, as opposed to evidence that might contradict a theory, clearly shows a bias in the scientist’s approach.

But at this point we really need to turn to something that underlies both science and religion – and perhaps all other fields of human activity: psychology.

The fact is that in many fields such as religion, science or even politics, whoever speaks at odds with the surrounding group’s ideals and belief systems is more than likely to face some form of social rejection, whereas whoever speaks to consolidate those ideals and belief systems is likely to enjoy elevated social status.   At a deep subliminal level we all have pragmatic knowledge of these group dynamics and we generally sense it to be in our best interests that we concur with the group rather than challenge it.   The radical thinker who questions his church’s doctrines is likely to meet the same sort of trouble as the radical thinker who argues that the theoretical acrobatics of modern physics are way too speculative, devoid of any meaningful empirical proofs, and therefore mostly the result of runaway group-think.   In both cases, those who enjoy social status and esteem as champions and leaders of the current ideas are likely to feel threatened by anyone undermining the group’s beliefs and values.

But if the ‘infidel’ finds himself highly unwelcome, it is rarely because his ideas have been debunked; ironically, his rejection more likely results from some potential credibility within those ideas.   And the scale of the group’s retaliation is generally proportionate to the gravity of the challenge laid against it.   For example, whereas it is quite easy with a little academic physics to bewilder and outsmart any layman refuting theories of relativity because he simply cannot believe some of the theoretical assertions, it is not so easy to outsmart someone who undermines relativity on the grounds that all human thought of any kind is inherently flawed – plus that in the particular case of cosmology empirical tests are effectively impossible.   Such challenges come from beyond what is conventionally considered the scope of physics and so they cannot easily be refuted by anything the learned expert in the field might have assimilated.   Moreover, they are not simply attacks on specific areas of theory; they are all-out broadsides on the very idea that physics is anything other than just another belief system in which the adherents’ attachment to their doctrines underlies a mindset that is only flexible to the extent that on rare occasions it has no option but to concede its previous errors.   And it should be noted that conceding errors is no measure of proof regarding whatever the human mind concocts to fill the resulting void.

It seems we are a species of believers and that bolstering belief itself generally takes precedence over any demonstrable proof regarding all the contradictory ideas in which we can believe.   How else could we be so confused?

Share

73 Responses

  1. Hi there this is kinda of off topic but I was wondering
    if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually
    code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding know-how so I
    wanted to get guidance from someone with experience.

    Any help would be enormously appreciated!

  2. Aw, this was an extremely good post. Taking the
    time and actual effort to generate a great article… but what can I say…
    I hesitate a lot and don’t manage to get anything done.

  3. Hey there! Quick question that’s completely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile
    friendly? My weblog looks weird when browsing from my apple iphone.
    I’m trying to find a template or plugin that might be able to fix this problem.

    If you have any recommendations, please share.

    Thank you!

  4. It’s appropriate time to make a few plans for the long run and it is time to be happy.

    I have read this publish and if I may just I want to counsel you few attention-grabbing
    things or suggestions. Perhaps you could write next articles relating
    to this article. I want to read even more issues about it!

  5. Magnificent beat ! I wish to apprentice even as you amend your web site, how could i subscribe for a blog
    website? The account helped me a appropriate deal.
    I have been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered brilliant transparent concept

  6. Hi there every one, here every one is sharing these familiarity, so it’s good to
    read this web site, and I used to go to see this web site all the time.

  7. whoah this blog is fantastic i like studying your articles.

    Stay up the great work! You realize, lots of individuals
    are hunting around for this information, you could help them greatly.

  8. I think this is among the most vital info for me. And i’m glad reading your article.

    But wanna remark on few general things, The website style is wonderful, the
    articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers

  9. I have fun with, cause I found just what I used to be looking for.
    You have ended my 4 day lengthy hunt! God Bless you man.
    Have a great day. Bye

  10. I’m extremely impressed along with your writing abilities and also with the
    structure on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it your self?
    Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it’s rare
    to look a nice weblog like this one these days..

  11. Have you ever thought about including a little bit more than just your
    articles? I mean, what you say is valuable and everything. But think of if you
    added some great images or video clips to give your posts
    more, “pop”! Your content is excellent but with
    pics and video clips, this website could definitely be one of the best in its field.

    Very good blog!

  12. This is a merest sharp post. Thankyou pro posting this dazzling article.

    [url=https://sites.google.com/view/xbody-bucuresti-ems-fitness/]xbody dristor[/url]

  13. I just could not leave your website before suggesting that I really
    loved the standard info an individual supply to your visitors?
    Is gonna be again ceaselessly to check up on new posts

  14. Amazing blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from somewhere?

    A design like yours with a few simple adjustements would really
    make my blog shine. Please let me know where you got your design. Many thanks

  15. Hi there! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I
    came to give it a look. I’m definitely loving the information. I’m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers!

    Great blog and superb design.

  16. My partner and I absolutely love your blog
    and find most of your post’s to be exactly what I’m looking for.
    can you offer guest writers to write content for you?
    I wouldn’t mind publishing a post or elaborating on a lot
    of the subjects you write concerning here. Again, awesome weblog!

  17. I absolutely love your website.. Excellent colors & theme.

    Did you make this amazing site yourself? Please reply back as I’m planning to create my own website and would like to know where you
    got this from or exactly what the theme is named. Cheers!

  18. When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added”
    checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four e-mails with the same comment.
    Is there any way you can remove me from that service? Appreciate it!

  19. Excellent beat ! I would like to apprentice whilst you amend
    your web site, how can i subscribe for a weblog web site?
    The account aided me a acceptable deal. I have been tiny bit
    familiar of this your broadcast offered shiny clear idea

  20. You have made some really good points there.
    I checked on the internet for more information about the issue and
    found most people will go along with your views on this website.

  21. No matter if some one searches for his essential thing, therefore he/she wishes to
    be available that in detail, therefore that thing is maintained over here.

  22. Hi are using WordPress for your site platform?
    I’m new to the blog world but I’m trying to get started and
    create my own. Do you require any html coding expertise to make your own blog?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  23. Aw, this was an exceptionally good post. Taking the time
    and actual effort to make a superb article… but what can I say… I procrastinate a whole lot and never seem to get nearly anything done.

  24. Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up and let you know a few of the pictures aren’t loading correctly.

    I’m not sure why but I think its a linking issue.
    I’ve tried it in two different internet browsers and
    both show the same results.

  25. Greetings from Colorado! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to check out your site on my iphone during lunch break.
    I enjoy the knowledge you present here and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
    I’m shocked at how fast your blog loaded on my phone ..
    I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyhow, awesome site!

  26. What’s up mates, good article and fastidious arguments
    commented here, I am genuinely enjoying by these.

  27. I simply couldn’t leave your web site before suggesting that I actually enjoyed the standard information a person supply on your guests?

    Is going to be again frequently in order to check up on new posts

  28. Hmm it seems like your website ate my first comment
    (it was extremely long) so I guess I’ll just sum it up
    what I submitted and say, I’m thoroughly enjoying your blog.
    I too am an aspiring blog writer but I’m still new to everything.
    Do you have any suggestions for novice blog writers? I’d really appreciate it.

  29. It’s very effortless to find out any topic on net as compared to textbooks, as I found
    this piece of writing at this web page.

  30. I visit daily a few web sites and information sites to read content, but this blog gives
    quality based content.

  31. Hi there! I’m at work surfing around your blog from my new iphone!
    Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all
    your posts! Keep up the outstanding work!

  32. Howdy, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam responses?
    If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can suggest?
    I get so much lately it’s driving me mad so any assistance is very
    much appreciated.

  33. Wow, superb blog layout! How long have you been blogging for?

    you make blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is fantastic, let alone
    the content!

  34. A person necessarily assist to make severely articles I would state.
    That is the first time I frequented your web page and
    so far? I surprised with the analysis you made to create this particular put up incredible.
    Fantastic process!

  35. Hello, I enjoy reading all of your article post.
    I wanted to write a little comment to support you.

  36. Hi there! I could have sworn I’ve been to this web site before but after looking
    at many of the articles I realized it’s new to me. Nonetheless, I’m certainly pleased I found it and I’ll be book-marking
    it and checking back regularly!

  37. Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this site.
    It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very
    difficult to get that “perfect balance” between superb usability and visual appearance.
    I must say you have done a very good job
    with this. In addition, the blog loads very fast for
    me on Firefox. Exceptional Blog!

  38. Wonderful beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your web site,
    how could i subscribe for a blog website? The account helped me a
    acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast offered bright clear concept

  39. Wonderful blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo
    News. Do you have any tips on how to get listed in Yahoo News?
    I’ve been trying for a while but I never seem to get there!
    Many thanks

  40. Hello There. I found your blog using msn. This is an extremely well written article.
    I will make sure to bookmark it and come back to read more of your
    useful information. Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely return.

  41. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew
    of any widgets I could add to my blog that automatically tweet my
    newest twitter updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for
    quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this.

    Please let me know if you run into anything. I truly enjoy
    reading your blog and I look forward to your new updates.

  42. Oh my goodness! Amazing article dude! Thank you so much, However I am having issues with your
    RSS. I don’t know why I can’t join it. Is there anybody having similar RSS
    issues? Anyone who knows the solution will you kindly respond?
    Thanks!!

  43. Hello would you mind stating which blog platform you’re using?
    I’m planning to start my own blog soon but I’m having a hard time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different
    then most blogs and I’m looking for something completely unique.
    P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  44. I like what you guys tend to be up too. This kind of clever work and coverage!

    Keep up the good works guys I’ve added you guys to our blogroll.

  45. Yesterday, while I was at work, my cousin stole my iPad
    and tested to see if it can survive a 30 foot
    drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My iPad is now destroyed and she has 83 views.
    I know this is totally off topic but I had to share it with someone!

  46. Hey I know this is off topic but I was wondering if you knew of any widgets I
    could add to my blog that automatically tweet
    my newest twitter updates. I’ve been looking for a plug-in like this for
    quite some time and was hoping maybe you would have some experience with something like this.
    Please let me know if you run into anything.
    I truly enjoy reading your blog and I look forward
    to your new updates.

  47. Pretty! This was an incredibly wonderful article. Thanks for providing this info.

  48. Hi there would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re working with?
    I’m planning to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having
    a tough time selecting between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design seems different
    then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique.

    P.S Apologies for being off-topic but I had to
    ask!

  49. Hi! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with
    hackers? My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing a few months of hard work due to no backup.
    Do you have any solutions to prevent hackers?

  50. Good way of explaining, and nice post to get data regarding my presentation subject, which i am going to
    deliver in institution of higher education.

  51. Excellent items from you, man. I have take into accout your
    stuff previous to and you are just extremely great. I actually like what you have obtained here,
    certainly like what you’re stating and the best way in which you assert it.
    You are making it entertaining and you continue to take care of to stay it
    smart. I can not wait to learn far more from you.
    This is actually a great site.

  52. Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and
    wanted to say that I’ve truly enjoyed surfing around your blog posts.

    After all I will be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you
    write again very soon!

  53. Great beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your website,
    how can i subscribe for a blog web site? The account aided me
    a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit acquainted of this
    your broadcast offered bright clear idea

Leave a Reply